NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:16:53 -0500
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Ideally, everyone would adopt this reasonable attitude. 
Domain tasting has been eliminated as far as I know. It was a predictable outcome of ICANN's approach to a "grace period" and I think it has been fixed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> Isn't gTLD enlargement at least in part proposed to, in time, kill the
> many contestations over who owns a given alphanumeric string? I mean,
> with a limitless gTLD space, isn't the message: "market, disseminate,
> develop [your brand and its chosen gTLD] rather than protect [it]?" I
> don't think it's too much to ask for gvnmt to pay for whatever
> contestations they have. In turn, ICANN should ban domain tasting. Is
> this already being done?
> 
> Nicolas
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2