NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date:
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:06:24 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi,

ok, the constituencies (full status and candidate) need  to come up with some sort of feedback, which can perhaps be combined and endorsed as a NCSG statement, though perhaps not - dependng in the points of view.

a.


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 16 December 2010 08:51:56 EST
> To: GNSO Council <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [council] Feedback from GNSO groups on Rec6 CWG recommendations
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> As a reminder, the Council passed a motion on the Rec6 CWG at the Cartagena meeting and resolved that: "each Stakeholder Group  and constituency provide feedback as soon as possible to the Council,  on the CWG recommendations".
> 
> Please make sure your respective groups are aware of this so that feedback can be provided at our next Council meeting, on Jan 13.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane

ATOM RSS1 RSS2