Yup. Same here. It would have been nice to get a "yes" or a "no" with an explanation on why not. Asking for an update and briefing regarding future plans on the topic seems appropriate for the NCSG meeting with the board to me. 

Thanks. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 16, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 	• Q4 on Public Interest Commitments: this seems like it offers multiple angles for conversation, so I’d suggest it be the lead question and main focus.  The Board didn’t ask for clarification of this one.
>> 
>> I’d particularly like to hear more about the work that is supposedly being done by the informal group that was formed in the Singapore meeting on this topic. My understanding is that there are board members involved in it.
> 
> Agreed.  I sent an email to the board member said to be organizing that PIC discussion group (Cherine Chalaby) asking to be included in those discussions but I never received a response.
> 
> So I remain concerned about what is happening in that process.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin