Hi all,

Following Julf's email below, I have put the survey questions on a Google
doc
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/152M74BQvvSEHUX02x9mQB8KPe7KJCZnI/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=113654238139175902989&rtpof=true&sd=true>
to ease collection of our responses. The CCOICI team anticipates a single
submission for the whole SG, so please insert your thoughts into the
document. We can then use some time in our PC meeting in Puerto Rico to
discuss the responses and thereafter consolidate them.

Warmly,
Tomslin



On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 17:27, Johan Helsingius <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Pursuant to the CCOICI Framework (29 June 2021)
> <
> https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/continuous-improvement-oversight-implementation-framework-29jun21-en.pdf>,
>
> the GNSO Council created the Committee for Overseeing and Implementing
> Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) as the first step of a pilot to allow
> for a more limited rollout of the GNSO Framework, rather than an
> immediate implementation of the whole Framework, should the Council and
> GNSO community decide that it is worthwhile to continue. The objective
> of the CCOICI was to create a framework that allows for the continuous
> scoping and execution of projects that are focused on GNSO’s structural,
> procedural, and process improvements. Please refer to the Charter
> <https://community.icann.org/display/CCFOICI/2.+Charter>for further
> details.
>
> Subsequently, the CCOICI worked on and delivered recommendations to the
> GNSO Council on three topics: 1) GNSO Working Group Self-Assessment
> Requirements; 2) GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) Requirements; and 3)
> Assessment of Accountability Work Stream 2 implementation status and
> ranking of recommendations to help inform the prioritization by the
> Community Coordination Group. The CCOICI handled the first two topics
> directly while launching a Task Force (TF) to review and provide
> recommendations on GNSO SOI Requirements.
>
> Regarding CCOICI structure and the handling of these three tasks, and in
> consideration of the efficiency of the structure and mechanism, the
> CCOICI would like to conduct a satisfaction survey of each SG/C to
> evaluate if the Council and GNSO community see value in continuing the
> use of the CCOICI Framework.
>
> The results of this survey would be public and used to support the
> continuous improvement program as well as input for the Holistic Review,
> determining whether the objective and scope of the Framework was clear
> and appropriate, if the Framework should continue and if so, how it
> could be improved. If the survey results note a significant issue, this
> shall be the trigger to initiate appropriate measures to deal with any
> such issues.
>
> The proposed due date for this survey is Tuesday, 5 March 2024. We
> kindly request each SG/C to discuss each survey question as a group and
> submit one survey response per SG/C. We would like to encourage members
> to start the discussions in February and use the ICANN79 Meeting in San
> Juan as a wrap-up and submission of the responses.
>
> Herewith attached are the survey questions in a document format
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qro5LApC5bUfjr1uSb-Q5lofzJAly0jyiWs6oX0ofHo/edit>for
>
> your reference. Kindly enter each SG/C's single, consolidated response
> into the survey link <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/P7XQGJL>for
> submission.
>
> We look forward to your kind cooperation and feedback. Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> CCOICI Team on behalf of the GNSO Council
>