Hi
I just randomly peeked at a couple proposals and note this questionnaire response:
d. Were consultations with end users appropriate? Which groups were consulted? What were the nature and content of these consultations?:
N/A
Hardly unique but still somehow a wee bit sad.
Bill
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RSEP is the policy process by which exceptions in the policies
> governing a Registry are made. Using the RESP is part of the policy, so
> that one size fits all policy can be altered to fit specific cases.
>
> This RSEP request is currently in comment period. After recommendations
> will be made to the Board which has the ultimate authority to decide.
>
> Process is defined in
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-bd-2012-02-25-en
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> On 09-Jul-14 17:03, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> Perhaps someone could care to educate me further on how things work in
>> ICANN. If a request as the one contained in this announcement is
>> received by ICANN, do they review such proposal based on the existing
>> policies? and if they do, and determine that a proposal does not fit
>> into existing policy/guidelines, is it right for ICANN staff to suggest
>> updating existing processes to allow a proposal go through?
>>
>> This is the way I understood this particular call and I hope someone can
>> confirm that my understanding is incorrect.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>> __
>> ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
>>
>>
>> News Alert
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-07-08-en
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names for .DEALS, XN--FJQ720A,
>> .CITY, .XYZ, .COLLEGE, .GOP, .TRADE, .WEBCAM, .BID, .HEALTHCARE,
>> .WORLD, .BAND
>>
>> 8 July 2014
>>
>>
>>
>> *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 8 July 2014
>> *Categories/Tags:*
>>
>> o Top-Level Domains
>> o Second-Level Domains
>> o Contracted Party Agreements
>> o Security/Stability
>>
>> *Purpose (Brief):*
>>
>> Six (6) Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) requests were
>> submitted by the registry operators listed below to allow the
>> introduction of two-character domain names for the below TLDs. In total,
>> the requests concern 12 New gTLDs.
>>
>> Proposal TLD Registry Name Documents
>> 2014027 healthcare
>> world
>> band Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 25 June 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-healthcare-world-band-request-25jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 16 KB]
>> 2014024 trade
>> webcam
>> bid Elite Registry Limited Elite Registry Limited Request 16 June 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/elite-registry-trade-request-16jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 16 KB]
>> 2014023 gop Republican State Leadership Committee, Inc. Republican
>> State Leadership Committee, Inc. Request 12 June 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rslc-gop-request-12jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 15 KB]
>> 2014022 xyz
>> college XYZ.COM <http://XYZ.COM>, LLC XYZ.COM, LLC Request 12 June
>> 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/xyz-xyz-college-request-12jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 18 KB]
>> 2014016 city Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 6 June 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-city-request-06jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 16 KB]
>> 2014015 deals
>> xn--fjq720a Binky Lake, LLC* Binky Lake, LLC Request 6 June 2014
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/binky-lake-deals-forsale-xn--fjq720a-request-06jun14-en.pdf>
>> [PDF, 16 KB]
>>
>> *Note: Binky Lake, LLC has submitted three RSEP requests on behalf of
>> Donuts, Inc. for 6 gTLDs
>>
>> As part of these requests, each registry operator described which
>> two-character domain names for which it would offer these registrations.
>> These RSEP requests were posted for public information on the Registry
>> Service Evaluation Process webpage, available at
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-2014-02-19-en.
>>
>> As required by the Registry Services Evaluation Policy
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html>, ICANN has
>> undertaken a preliminary determination on whether the proposals might
>> raise significant competition, security or stability issues. ICANN's
>> preliminary review (based on the information provided) did not identify
>> any such issues for these requests.
>>
>> Implementation of the proposal would require amendments to the Exhibit
>> A, Approved Services of the respective Registry Agreements, which are
>> being posted for public comment.
>>
>> *Public Comment Box Link:*
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en
>> <https://www.icann.org//public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-07-08-en>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message was sent to [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> from:
>>
>> ICANN News Alert | [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite
>> 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>>
>>
|
