NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:16:06 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2337 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
Robin,

Nice that they waited until the last minute to submit this, without  
ever seeking a discussion with us in any setting.

What's the precise cut off time for comments?  It's what, 2pm in  
California, so there is some time before COB.  If you have a little  
head space, why not write a short critique of the CSG Charter, such  
that it is?  It's after 11pm here and I can't type any more today, but  
I'd support whatever you come up with.  There's plenty to complain  
about starting with the first para, which claims the CSC represents  
"users;" the restrictive membership construction (e.g. how many  
individual entrepreneurs do they have, how representative, diverse,  
and "deserving" are they); and complete lack of clarity and  
development in their draft about essentially all institutional aspects  
(all those high-paid lawyers and this is the best they can do?), a  
point that should be hammered. Perhaps a new council shouldn't be  
seated until they clarify how they will select six reflecting the  
criteria we are alleged not to meet.

Just a thought.

Bill




On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Robin Gross wrote:

> The IP Constituency submitted its comments today on the stakeholder  
> group petitions.
>
> See:
>    http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/ 
> pdfyb62GoZM3w.pdf
>
> It calls on the ICANN Board to deny the Non-Commercial Stakeholder  
> Group its rightful 6 council seats, claiming we aren't  
> "representative" enough.  The IPC complains because our counselors  
> will remain seated after June (but doesn't mention that its own  
> counselors will also remain seated).  In fact, it didn't make any  
> comments on its own proposals - it is only a slam on all non- 
> commercial users proposals.
>
> Wow.  They really are desperate with this move.
>
> Robin
>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
   Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
[log in to unmask]
New book: Governing Global Electronic Networks,
http://tinyurl.com/5mh9jj
***********************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2