NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:25:56 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (628 bytes) , text/html (1477 bytes)
 
>Who is it that "agreed" to the top 5 items listed?  
 
Everyone but you. Check the list archives. 
 
>Of course, it is completely unacceptable to divert the 
>constituencies away from having access to GNSO 
>council seats to some pointless committee.

I guess you don't understand what is being proposed. 

All members would directly elect Council seats under the proposal. The committees are constituted AFTER the officers are elected, e.g. a Policy Committee would consist of elected GNSO Council members, the Chair (all of whom are elected by members) plus constituency delegates (elected by the constituencies).

 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2