NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:44:48 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
With the U.S. Federal election two months away, several weeks after the 
planned IANA transition,
these moves might be designed for partisan political advantage in the 
last two or three weeks leading up to the election.
It is not hard to speculate about strategies to knock off two birds (a 
candidate and the transition) with one move.
Even if the U.S. Senate and House do nothing, the transition process and 
the election can be seriously impacted here,
especially by a well timed and well orchestrated media campaign. 
Hopefully such choppy waters do not materialize.

Sam L.

On 9/8/2016 3:11 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe wrote:
>
> /**“The transition of the IANA functions to the global 
> multi-stakeholder community is a serious, groundbreaking, and 
> potentially unalterable action.”**/
>
> *WASHINGTON* - House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton 
> (R-Mich.), U.S. Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee 
> Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.), Senate Committee on the Judiciary 
> Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and House Judiciary Committee 
> Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) today, in a letter 
> <http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTYwOTA4LjYzNTA1NjYxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE2MDkwOC42MzUwNTY2MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MzQ0NzI1JmVtYWlsaWQ9c29uaWdpdHUuZWtwZUBncmFkdWF0ZWluc3RpdHV0ZS5jaCZ1c2VyaWQ9c29uaWdpdHUuZWtwZUBncmFkdWF0ZWluc3RpdHV0ZS5jaCZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&100&&&https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9b6b37a9-e5a4-4695-931e-73d54b32f768/D453845EFDC860DCC3161346BBCA9C63.20160908-doj-lynch-doc-pritzker-joint-letter-on-iana-transition.pdf> to 
> U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Secretary of Commerce Penny 
> Pritzker, raised numerous concerns about plans for the Obama 
> Administration to cede authority over the Internet Assigned Numbers 
> Authority (IANA) functions managed by the Internet Corporation for 
> Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and called for reconsideration of 
> the transition, currently set to occur on October 1, 2016.


>
> “The transition of the IANA functions to the global multi-stakeholder 
> community is a serious, groundbreaking, and potentially unalterable 
> action,” said the four chairmen in the letter to Lynch and Pritzker. 
> “We have closely examined the arguments for and against the proposed 
> transition, including concerns about whether the transition could 
> enhance the role of authoritarian regimes in Internet governance. In 
> particular, we have heard from witnesses testifying to concerns that 
> important accountability measures have yet to be fully fleshed out, 
> tested, or proven, because they will not have been implemented prior 
> to September 30, 2016.”


>
> In addition to concerns about the status of accountability reforms 
> inside ICANN, the four chairmen also cited recent violations of 
> ICANN’s own bylaws by board members, questions about the application 
> of anti-trust laws, the potential for an independent ICANN to move 
> outside the jurisdiction of the United States, and unfinished work by 
> the non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) in determining 
> the legal authority for the federal government to relinquish its 
> current role in IANA functions without express authorization from 
> Congress.
>
> “There is a broad range of important questions on both law and policy 
> that remain outstanding with respect to the proposed transfer of the 
> IANA functions to ICANN and the global multi-stakeholder community. We 
> call on you to address the questions and concerns detailed above and 
> to reconsider the Administration’s current plans to transition the 
> IANA functions on October 1, 2016.”
>
> The IANA functions of the internet include the process for resolving 
> domain names and helping to keep the internet running smoothly. ICANN, 
> which manages the IANA functions, currently works under contract for 
> the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), 
> an agency within the Department of Commerce.
>
> The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee and the 
> House Committee on Energy and Commerce exercise principal jurisdiction 
> over the Department of Commerce. The Senate Committee on the Judiciary 
> and the House Judiciary Committee exercise jurisdiction over the 
> Department of Justice.
>
> /Click here for a copy of the //letter 
> <http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTYwOTA4LjYzNTA1NjYxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE2MDkwOC42MzUwNTY2MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MzQ0NzI1JmVtYWlsaWQ9c29uaWdpdHUuZWtwZUBncmFkdWF0ZWluc3RpdHV0ZS5jaCZ1c2VyaWQ9c29uaWdpdHUuZWtwZUBncmFkdWF0ZWluc3RpdHV0ZS5jaCZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&101&&&https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9b6b37a9-e5a4-4695-931e-73d54b32f768/D453845EFDC860DCC3161346BBCA9C63.20160908-doj-lynch-doc-pritzker-joint-letter-on-iana-transition.pdf>// from 
> Thune, Grassley, Upton, and Goodlatte to Lynch and Pritzker./
>
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
  邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852



ATOM RSS1 RSS2