NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Debbie's comments on the charter review
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 May 2010 08:48:18 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (287 bytes) , text/html (611 bytes) 
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Rosemary Sinclair <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Could the Board approve a Constituency and nominate it as part of NCSG if
> our Charter is silent on Constituencies?
>

One suspects such a move would risk an unpopular "top-down imposition"
interpretation?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2