Agreed.

Thanks,
Robin

> On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> @Milton +1
> 
> 
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> 
>> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission.
>> 
>> --MM
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>> James Gannon
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>>> 
>>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related
>>> campaign.
>>> 
>>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be
>>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
>>> endorse?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."
>>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be
>>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
>>>> 
>