I do not support this notion at all.

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:27 AM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> What do people think?
>
> Is this a PDP we support?
>
> And are members willing to volunteer for the WGs and the comments?
>
> avri
>
> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mary Wong
> Date:05/25/2014 10:16 (GMT-05:00)
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [council] Final Issue Report on IGO & INGO Access to Curative
> Rights Protection Mechanisms
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached for your consideration the Final Issue Report on
> amending the UDRP and URS to enable IGO and INGO access to curative rights
> protection mechanisms. You will recall that the Council requested an Issue
> Report on the topic at the Buenos Aires meeting in November 2013 when it
> adopted the consensus recommendations from the PDP WG on Protection of
> International Organization Identifiers in All gTLDs (IGO-INGO PDP WG). Under
> the ICANN Bylaws, an Issue Report is a mandatory preceding step to a
> possible PDP that is initiated by the GNSO Council. The Preliminary Issue
> Report was published for public comment on 10 March 2014, with the reply
> period of the forum closing on 6 May 2014. A Report of Public Comments
> received was published on 16 May 2014.
>
> In preparing this Final Issue Report, all the public comments received were
> analyzed and, where relevant, incorporated into the Final Issue Report. The
> Report of Public Comments has also been added as a separate Annex.
>
> Essentially, the staff recommendation is that the Council initiate a PDP to
> consider: (1) whether the UDPR and/or URS should be amended for IGO and INGO
> access and use; and (2) if so, in what way or whether a separate, narrowly
> tailored procedure modeled on these measures, to apply specifically only to
> IGOs and INGOs, should be developed. Staff also recommends that the PDP be
> limited to considering only those IGO and INGO identifiers that the original
> IGO-INGO PDP WG recommended for protection, and the Final Issue Report
> outlines a number of specific issues and additional considerations for the
> Council to review in determining the scope and work of the PDP.
>
> The relevant motions are currently in preparation for proposal by a GNSO
> Councilor.
>
> The public comment forum, including a link to the Report of Public Comments,
> the Preliminary Issue Report and the Final Report of the IGO-INGO PDP WG can
> be found here:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/igo-ingo-crp-prelim-2014-03-10-en.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> * One World. One Internet. *



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel