Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. |
Date: | Thu, 1 Dec 2016 05:41:06 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
+1 Klaus
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 1 Dec 2016, at 2:00, Klaus Stoll wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making
> topics as we spend time on the merits of various places around the
> world to host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about what
> we need to discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to achieve and how
> to get there. When we do this, the place might not be of such an
> importance.
>
> Yours
>
> Klaus
>
> PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely!
>
>
>
> On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> Sam,
>>
>> I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said
>> "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf>
>> of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type [locations]
>> into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions, please, because we
>> can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing that in." If that
>> instruction was ignored and our representatives on the call did
>> instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting a meeting such as
>> this one, I'm not sure who they thought they were serving.
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
>>> Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM
>>> UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH
>>> Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript
>>> makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last minute,
>>> and
>>> some serious and some almost in jest.
>>>
>>> One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that
>>> Reykjavik
>>> remains a front runner.
>>> The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd.
>>>
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf
>>>
>>> Sam L.
>>
|
|
|