NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.
Date:
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 05:41:06 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2304 bytes) , text/html (5 kB)
+1 Klaus

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 1 Dec 2016, at 2:00, Klaus Stoll wrote:

> Dear All
>
> I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making 
> topics as we spend time on the merits of various places around the 
> world to host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about what 
> we need to discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to achieve and how 
> to get there. When we do this, the place might not be of such an 
> importance.
>
> Yours
>
> Klaus
>
> PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely!
>
>
>
> On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> Sam,
>>
>> I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said 
>> "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf> 
>> of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type [locations] 
>> into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions, please, because we 
>> can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing that in." If that 
>> instruction was ignored and our representatives on the call did 
>> instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting a meeting such as 
>> this one, I'm not sure who they thought they were serving.
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
>>> Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM
>>> UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH
>>> Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript
>>> makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last minute, 
>>> and
>>> some serious and some almost in jest.
>>>
>>> One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that 
>>> Reykjavik
>>> remains a front runner.
>>> The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd.
>>>
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf
>>>
>>> Sam L.
>>




ATOM RSS1 RSS2