NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:49:59 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
	The quoted email from Roberto seems quite remarkable. 
Essentially, it seems as if both Roberto and the SIC have already 
more or less conceded our main point.
	It sounds like in Seoul we should simply keep repeating that 
we want constituencies, we just don't want them directly linked to 
voting. Then see if anyone sticks is willing to actually speak up for 
constituencies linked to voting - and if no one is, then we don't 
need to promote our NCSG charter per se, just make it clear that the 
SIC charter is fatally flawed on that basis, and we are happy to hear 
alternatives to our own that still ensure represenation.
	Cheers
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2