NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Haffely <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Haffely <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:25:52 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2267 bytes) , text/html (2990 bytes)
The concerning part about the report from today is that the domain owner
never received any complaint or due process before the domains were seized.
It appears that no Cease and Desist, warrant, suit, or other criminal
complaint was brought up before the domain was taken.  What if (for an
example) this behavior is taken up by the Patent and Copyright "trolls".
What happens to an individual/nonprofit/organization when they have their
domain yanked out from under them?

If ICANN is to seize domains from their rightful owners by demand of a law
enforcement agency we need to have a clear, *rapid* appeals process to
prevent abuse by corporations, law enforcement agencies, and governments.


-Mike H.



On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Andrew A. Adams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Very similar moves are happening in the UK, with Nominet (UK non-profit
> with
> the .uk (and .gb) country-code delegation) engaging with the UK's SOCA
> (Serious and Organised Crime Agency *) to remove 1200 "sites engaged in
> selling counterfeit goods" recently and now doing a more explicit deal with
> the police to take down the DNS registration for sites "alleged to be
> involved in criminal activity".
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/25/nominet_crime/
>
> (*) The SOCA is a rather dodgy organisation, IMHO. When it was set up the
> then home secrewtary made a big thing of it not being actually police and
> therefore not bound by the requirements that the police have to respect the
> human rights of citizens. THat's a recipe for a secret police operating
> extra-judicially and here we see exactly that kind of approach.
>
> I am very worried by these kinds of moves. Zittrain's "The Future of the
> Internet" and Mueller's "Networks and States" concerns about censorship
> becoming the norm not the exception online seem to be coming true. While
> I'm
> not in favour of criminals having free reign, the trouble is that all the
> hard won freedoms such as due process, balance of rights, etc. seem to be
> being thrown out in the digital domain.
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2