Hi,

I think they both say a similar thing.

- the greater ICANN accountability is seperate
- accountability related to IANA is in scope

avri


On 13-Aug-14 17:01, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I am wondering why this statement on accountability seems to assume
> that there is "no linkage" between ICANN accountability and IANA
> accountability, when, in fact, there is.
> 
> "Any linkages between the work of the CWG on the IANA transition and
> the broader ICANN Accountability Review Process with regard to ICANN
> policy are outside the scope of this group's work. Accountability for
> the administration of the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and
> operational accountability), however, is properly within the scope of
> this working group."
> 
> The ICG charter handled this relationship in a much better way:
> 
> " The IANA stewardship transition process is taking place alongside a
> parallel and related process on enhancing ICANN accountability. While
> maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is
> central to both processes, this group's scope is focused on the
> arrangements required for the continuance of IANA functions in an
> accountable and widely accepted manner after the expiry of the
> NTIA-ICANN contract. Nevertheless, the two processes are interrelated
> and interdependent and should appropriately coordinate their work."
> 
> --MM
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-Discuss
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria 
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:42 PM To:
>> [log in to unmask] Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd:
>> [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter
>> 
>> 
>> Next step is SOAC chartering organization review and hopefully
>> approval so we can actually start the work.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: 	[CWG-DT-Stewardship]
>> Final Draft Charter
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all, Attached is the final version of the draft charter.
> 
>