NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Wed, 26 May 2010 14:36:30 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 26 May 2010, at 14:12, Dan Krimm wrote:

> 
> If greatly qualified people can't even find the time to participate in
> this vote, what expectation do we have that they would be able to
> contribute in any other way in the future?


I do not think this follows.

Very often people are tightly focused on the issue that is important to them and this process stuff just doesn't catch their attention.

Sure to process geeks like me this is both important and interesting, but I understand how others could find it so boring and dreary that they really need a lot of encouragement to finally say, 'oh, ok, how do i vote".

So if you happen to be one of those people, I understand.  And if you happen to read this message and haven't voted yet please do - you should have received a ballot - please make sure it isn't in you filter folder.

And if you have voted thanks.

a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2