NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Jun 2014 17:15:22 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1190 bytes) , text/html (1761 bytes)
This is an example of the wording that the US Government is now using when
talking about the future of Internet governance. It helps when thinking
about the properties of a deliverable IANA transition proposal.
Internet Governance: Multistakeholder, Multilateral Sectors Can Coexist

Internet Governance: Multistakeholder Consensus With Multilateral
Affirmation
by Daniel Sepulveda* 

	"One of the issues at the center of discussions over the future of
Internet governance is how multilateral and multistakeholder institutions
with an interest in working on Internet-related issues can coexist without
duplication or conflict and without threatening to undermine the Internet
and its promise. In an ideal world, each would learn from the other, and
the activity of one would only add value to the other".
Read more:
http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2014/06/20140618301689.html#ixzz35O9PZiGR
(http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2014/06/20140618301689.html#ixzz35O9PZiGR)

*Sepulveda serves as the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state and
coordinator for international communications and information policy in the
Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.
Sam Lanfranco



ATOM RSS1 RSS2