NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:26:27 +0300
Reply-To:
Subject:
From:
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 1/23/12, Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> So how does my proposal for submitting this set of comments as a NCSG
> position manifests that I 'try to obtain benefits for myself'? I think there
> is something wrong here with your sense of smelling.

I didn't mean you personally...You asked if anyone had any objection,
and I raised mine.

I'm not a big fan of obfuscation of contact details in WHOIS, and
can't see that non-commercials are in any way more or less special per
this requirement than anyone else!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2