+1 @ Farell
Cheers !


2016-06-08 9:02 GMT+01:00 Farell FOLLY <[log in to unmask]>:

> Hello,
>
> Sorry to jump into the discussion....
>
> @Shane >> Are we not ICANN?
>
> As long as we are part of the NCSG, we are part of ICANN too. And +1 to
> your point of view.
>
> --ff--
> Best regards
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Farell FOLLY
> Africa 2.0 Benin
> Chapter Head - Technology Champion
>
> t: +22997 248100
> s : Skype: farellf
> m: [log in to unmask]
> w :www.africa2point0.org
> l : www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
> tt : www.twitter.com/__f_f__
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] De la part de
> Shane Kerr
> Envoyé : mercredi 8 juin 2016 04:49
> À : [log in to unmask]
> Objet : Are we not ICANN? (was Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN
> Expected Standards of Behaviors)
>
> Fellow NCSG members,
>
> One thing that I had previously missed caught my eye just now:
>
> At 2016-06-07 14:07:25 +0200
> Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > On 06/03/2016 08:13 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> ...
> > > it isn't. It is possibly one of community culture, but if we accept
> > > that, we can't just push this back to ICANN to somehow deal with. I
> > > don't want a return to the Victorian moral panic of the 1880s, I
> > > don't want ICANN inhibiting anyone's free speech to satisfy a few
> special
> > > interests.
> ...
> > > Helsinki. If anything, I feel like WE are more at fault here than
> > > ICANN as an organisation is. WE are not respecting the processes
> > > already in
> ...
> > > ICANN has been very responsive to the concerns raised by the
> > > community,
>
> All of these statements share a similar tone: ICANN is something that we
> interact with, but we are not a part of ICANN.
>
> Perhaps I am confused, because I come from the IETF and RIR communities,
> which allow anyone to join and participate. While there is a distinction
> between the ARIN community and the ARIN not-for-profit company (for
> example) or the IETF and the IAB (as another example), for the most part
> direction comes from the wider, open community.
>
> You know, in a kind of bottom-up, open, inclusive way.
>
> So... if this is not how ICANN works, then I feel like the ICANN
> experiment has gone off the rails and is in serious danger of failing
> completely. If "ICANN" is something different from, well, us, then what is
> it?
>
> Are we not ICANN?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Shane
>



-- 
*Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI*
*Directeur-Adjoint de O and K IT SOLUTIONS sarl **Editeur de logiciels de
gestion (PGI/ERP) S.I.G.E. (http://www.oandkit.com
<http://www.oandkit.com>)*

*Président/CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut des TIC pour le développement)
http://www.intic4dev.org <http://www.intic4dev.org> *

*Eminent National Expert for the World Summit Award
(http://www.wsis-award.org <http://www.wsis-award.org>) *

*Secrétaire Général de l'ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des
professionnels des TIC (http://www.estetic.tg <http://www.estetic.tg>)*

*ICANN-GNSO-NCSG-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.npoc.org/
<http://www.npoc.org/>)**ICANN - Fellow & Alumni (http://www.icann.org
<http://www.icann.org>) - Membre de Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org
<http://www.isoc.org>) *
*Membre fondateur du RIK-Togo (Réseau Interprofessionnel du Karité au Togo)
*(http://www.globalshea.com)
*Skype : olevie1   FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé –
Togo*