NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:47:38 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 kB) multipart/related (96 kB) , text/html (96 kB) , bbjdaeci.png (96 kB)
All,

Here is the “trail” on the reference to the following statement...which 
leads back to ICANN.

  “/Domain-name overseer ICANN has decided that only one kind of doctor 
may be allowed online – and that is a medical doctor/”.

It is in the article by Kieren McCarthy at 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/15/icann_doctors/
Kieren cites a blog by Jon Nevett “/The .DOCTOR Quarantine/” in 
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150312_the_doctor_quarantine/

On March 12th Jon Nevett writes: /"In an utterly surprising move, ICANN 
staff and the Board's New gTLD Program Committee ("NGPC") recently 
informed the applicants for .DOCTOR that it has singled out the gTLD as 
a test case for controlling content and limiting speech on the Internet."

/The following jpeg is from the March 12, 2015 pdf at:

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-request-15-3-brice-trail-llc-redacted-12mar15-en.pdf






ATOM RSS1 RSS2