NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:03:35 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 kB) , text/html (19 kB)
Thank you Robin for sharing these informations with us.

Good luck to the candidates.

Cheers !


-Olévié-


2016-06-07 1:03 GMT+01:00 Remmy Nweke <[log in to unmask]>:

> thanks Robin
> Remmy
>
> ____
> REMMY NWEKE,  Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
> DigitalSENSE Africa Media [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
> (DigitalSENSE Business News
> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
> <http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet
> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
> Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
> Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
> <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria‎>
> NDSF 2016 June 2-3 @Digital Bridge Institute (DBI), (former NITEL Training
> School) NITEL Road, Cappa - Oshodi, Lagos <http://www.dbieducation.org/>
> _________________________________________________________________
> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
> are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
> only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
> responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
> not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
> any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Please see the below correspondence from the Civil Society Coordination
>> Group (CSCG) Chair Ian Peter to UN DESA regarding the civil society
>> nominations for attending the IGF retreat in New York next month.
>>
>> Best,
>> Robin
>>
>>  *From:* Ian Peter <[log in to unmask]>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 6:46 PM
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Civil Society Nominations for IGF PLanning Retreat, 14-16 July
>>
>>
>> Dear Chengetai,
>> We are pleased to forward the names of civil society representatives  nominated
>> for the IGF Retreat on Advancing the 10-Year Mandate of the Internet
>> Governance Forum on 14-16 July 2016.
>>
>>
>> Our understanding is that you want from us 2 designated participants,
>> plus 3-4 additional nominees. This is in addition to the MAG member’s
>> nomination of *Lea Kaspar*, which you will already be aware of.
>>
>>
>> Our two designated attendees are:
>>
>> *1. Stuart Hamilton* – Netherlands -Deputy Secretary General,
>> International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)
>>
>> *2  Anriette Esterhuysen* – South Africa – Executive Director,
>> Association for Progressive Communications (APC)
>>
>>
>> Our additional nominations are:
>>
>> *3. Jac S M Kee* – Malaysia – Manager Women’s Rights Program, APC
>>
>> *4. Cisse Kane* -Senegal - Chair, African Civil Society on the
>> Information Society (ACSIS)
>>
>> *5. Analia Apsis* – Argentina – Co-coordinator, Internet Governance
>> Caucus
>>
>> *6. Renata Ribeiro* – Brazil - IT Professor, Federal University of
>> Ceará, Brazil.
>>
>>
>> I believe you will have biographical details of all of these nominations,
>> as we believe they all also applied by your online system; but please
>> contact us if you need further information on any of these applicants.
>>
>> These names have been selected after following as best possible in the
>> time available our established procedures, which are outlined at
>> http://www.internetgov-cs.org/procedures. They were chosen from 10
>> people who made direct contact with us seeking endorsement as civil society
>> representatives. (Their names are included in Appendix A).
>>
>> We commend these excellent representatives of civil society to you.
>>
>> Additionally, and in the spirit of co-operation to ensure the best
>> possible representivity for civil society stakeholders as such events, I
>> wonder if you could take on board the following suggestions on conducting
>> future such exercises, and circulate these to relevant colleagues?
>>
>> The recommendations are based on the best practice we have observed with
>> other organisations in selecting multistakeholder representatives. We are
>> aware that on this occasion there have been some problems with the way this
>> event was announced, but we will keep our comments to some positive
>> suggestions on procedures for selecting applicants.
>>
>> 1.       The process you ran necessitated all civil society applicants
>> applying via your advertised procedures, and then separately to us. Most
>> organisations these days run a transparent process whereby applications
>> details are shared with stakeholder groups. This is not a privacy problem
>> if people are advised beforehand. We commend this method to you as one
>> which is easier for applicants, and also allows for better sharing of
>> information towards selecting the best possible candidates.
>> 2.       An unusual feature of the way this selection was managed is
>> that we needed to tell you our selections at the same time as you were
>> still receiving applications (our deadline was the same as the applicant’s
>> deadline). This was further complicated by the MAG members selecting their
>> representative at the same time. May we suggest that, in allocating
>> timeframes for such processes, you allow a period of time after individual
>> nominations have closed to receive stakeholder group nominations? This
>> makes for a less messy process all round.
>>
>> 3.       We understand that, in finalising stakeholder representatives,
>> you wish to ensure that you achieve the best possible gender and geographic
>> balance across stakeholder groups. Your process for doing this on this and
>> other occasions has been to make final selections yourselves without
>> further consultation with stakeholder groups. This can sometimes be
>> problematic, as you cannot possibly be aware of the ramifications of some
>> such choices within stakeholder groups.
>>
>>        The way other organisations have handled this is to arrange a
>> simultaneous phone hookup with representatives of stakeholder groups to
>> discuss such final balance issues. You will find that we actually work
>> quite well together in such circumstances, and we believe that the results
>> will be more acceptable to stakeholder groups if this quick final
>> consultation is included. This is also more aligned with the recommendation
>> of the Working Group on Improvements to the IGF, later endorsed by the UN
>> General Assembly, seeking self-management of stakeholder representative
>> processes by respective stakeholder groups. Your current practices need to
>> move further in this direction.
>>
>> We offer the above suggestions in the spirit of co-operation with you, as
>> we also want to see the best possible representation of stakeholders. And
>> again, we offer our services to work with you and other stakeholder groups
>> to refine procedures to ensure more acceptable and more representative
>> results.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Ian Peter – Independent Chair, Internet Governance Civil Society
>> Coordination Group (CSCG)
>>
>> (The Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG) exists solely to ensure a
>> coordinated civil society response and conduit when it comes to making
>> civil society appointments to outside bodies. It comprises representatives
>> of the coalition members of the Best Bits, Association for Progressive
>> Communications, Internet Governance Caucus, Just Net Coalition, and
>> Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group of ICANN. Together the reach of these
>> groups extends to many hundreds of non-governmental organisations, as well
>> as a much greater number of individuals. )
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> APPENDIX ONE –
>>
>>
>> APPLICANTS ASSESSED
>> Analia Apsis  *
>> Tijani Ben Jemaa
>> Deborah Brown
>> Anriette Esterhuysen **
>> Stuart Hamilton **
>> Cisse Kane *
>>  Jac SM Kee *
>> Remmy Nweke
>> Renata Ribeiro *
>>  Klaus Stoll
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
*Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI*
*Directeur-Adjoint de O and K IT SOLUTIONS sarl **Editeur de logiciels de
gestion (PGI/ERP) S.I.G.E. (http://www.oandkit.com
<http://www.oandkit.com>)*

*Président/CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut des TIC pour le développement)
http://www.intic4dev.org <http://www.intic4dev.org> *

*Eminent National Expert for the World Summit Award
(http://www.wsis-award.org <http://www.wsis-award.org>) *

*Secrétaire Général de l'ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des
professionnels des TIC (http://www.estetic.tg <http://www.estetic.tg>)*

*ICANN-GNSO-NCSG-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.npoc.org/
<http://www.npoc.org/>)**ICANN - Fellow & Alumni (http://www.icann.org
<http://www.icann.org>) - Membre de Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org
<http://www.isoc.org>) *
*Membre fondateur du RIK-Togo (Réseau Interprofessionnel du Karité au Togo)
*(http://www.globalshea.com)
*Skype : olevie1   FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé –
Togo*


ATOM RSS1 RSS2