NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (1.0)
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2013 03:01:20 -0500
Reply-To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: GAC comments - and a note on support for diversity of views in our community
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
But you are right it is considered part of the dispute resolution procedure, need to read again module 3

-Jorge

On May 14, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Going back to your original question, my point was that the whole ICC thing is dispute resolution process.
> 
> avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2