Hi,

And since Stephanie's comment was not accepted as part of the report, we
should submit it as a comment with a strong rebuke to the EWG for not
having allowed it to be attached.

This in addition to any other comments and it should be submitted on day
1 of the comment period - as close to being part of the report as possible.

avri



On 07-Jun-14 10:21, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Stephanie,
> 
> thank you for all efforts and I acknowledge the difficulty to
> participate in the EWG where it is not easy to defend privacy
> unfortunately. your participation probably helped to prevent more worse
> outcome. 
> 
> we need to respond to the report and so volunteers to do so( we have
> also to respond to the Whois and local laws too!)
> we have many things to discuss in London in this regard.
> can you please share your dissenting report if possible?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 2014-06-07 10:13 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>:
> 
>     The EWG report is out.  I wrote a dissenting report, but they would
>     not publish it.  I will give a prize to the persons who find what I
>     am complaining about (Tamir, Milton, and Kathy, you don't count!)
>     Thanks to all who have helped and encouraged me during this long and
>     lonely year.
>     Stephanie
> 
> 
>     -------- Original Message --------
> 
>     	
> 
>     	
> 
>     	
> 
>     	
> 
> 
> 
>     Dear All,____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     I am very pleased to inform you that the EWG Final Report is now
>     posted-  see:
>     https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf.  
>     ____
> 
>     __ __
> 
>     It will appear shortly on the ICANN homepage and will be part of a
>     blog  on Monday.____
> 
>     __ __
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> 
>