That is right, I fired that proposal off to our policy cttee...and I
think we have agreement that it is premature to disengage from this.
Other SGs may feel entirely different though. I think there is a
feeling that by disengaging, we are limiting scope creep at ICANN.
Personally, I doubt that. Important to stay engaged to *prevent* scope
creep....
But mostly, we need to talk this one around a bit.
cheers Stephanie
On 2016-10-28 13:44, Edward Morris wrote:
> Hi Ayden,
> Thanks for the question.
> I believe Stephanie has indicated that she will request a deferral on
> this motion, an action I most certainly support. We need time to speak
> to our colleagues in the Contracted Party House and Commercial
> Stakeholders Group, ascertain their concerns and level of support for
> the CWG-IG, and sort a way to move forward together. As a result of
> work of the CCWG squared WG there certainly will need to be some
> Charter amendments and adjustments to the group. That certainly is
> doable and I'm cautiously optimistic that we'll be able to fashion a
> way forward assuming, of course, we can find a minimal level of
> support elsewhere in the GNSO.
> Kind Regards,
> Ed Morris
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Ayden Férdeline" <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent*: Friday, October 28, 2016 5:37 PM
> *To*: [log in to unmask]
> *Subject*: Fwd: Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering
> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
> Can I please ask our GNSO Councillors to outline their position on the
> attached motion? I find it rather shocking and my initial reaction is
> that I hope the motion does not pass, but perhaps you can persuade me
> otherwise... Thanks.
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] Motion –
>> Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross
>> Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG)
>> issues affecting ICANN
>> Local Time: 27 October 2016 2:18 PM
>> UTC Time: 27 October 2016 13:18
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> To: Nigel Hickson <[log in to unmask]>
>> Dear members of the CCWG-IG,
>> I want to share this motion that has been put forward to the next GNSO
>> council meeting which will take place during the ICANN57 meeting.
>> Best regards
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> Forwarded message:
>> > From: Darcy Southwell <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering
>> > Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
>> > governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:56:30 -0700
>> >
>> > Dear Councilors,
>> >
>> > Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering
>> > Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
>> > governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council
>> > meeting.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Darcy
>> >
>> > __________
>> >
>> > Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
>> >
>> > M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
|
