NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:58:52 +0900
Reply-To:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
In-reply-to Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> message dated "Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:07:00 +0900."
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Wow, what a BIASED survey!

I could use this as an example for a postgrad class on survey creation 
showing my students how NOT to do it to get unbiased results, including the 
following egregious problems:

mixed sets of answers between providing information and providing access to 
the information of others;
lots of answers saying how hard privacy rules will make it for information 
holders and those seeking information, few on how hard it will be to maintain 
privacy

In all, the whole surveyis skewed towards the interests of 
registrars/registers and not registrees.

Hmm, who would I ask for an easier to access copy of the whole survey 8not 
the answers, just the survey)? This is ripe for a protocol/practice paper on 
information ethics.

-- 
Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2