NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:13:08 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
From:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
My understanding of an "enhanced accountability mechanism" is that it has several components. 
 
There is no one single master-slave-relationship. It is an interactive mechanism where various components offers various channels to turn input into impact.
 
wolfgang
 

________________________________

Von: Non-Commercial User Constituency im Auftrag von Avri Doria
Gesendet: Mi 16.09.2009 13:14
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability and International Conformity - IAIC at IGF?



On 16 Sep 2009, at 12:24, McTim wrote:

> If you want to have an
> impact on ICANN, you can't do it via the IGF.


well that is a bit strong.

certainly one can have the most direct effect by participating in 
ICANN and its vehicles.

but that does not mean that what goes on in the IGF is not seen by 
ICANN or that ICANN ignores it.
it most certainly can have an effect, albeit it indirect.


a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2