As per previous notes to Maria and Marilia, I'm interested in collaborating
in elaborating on *underrepresentation of developing countries* under
different perspectives: political, distributional (or international trade)
and purely commercial (economies of scale).

Carlos Raúl
On Sep 30, 2015 7:03 AM, "Norbert Klein" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

+1 supporting Rafik's suggestions/initiatives to elaborate.


Norbert Klein
Kep/Cambodia

=


On 09/30/2015 06:56 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:

Hi everyone,

trying to summarize the topics suggested until now, I tried to capture
comments as much as possible but maybe I missed things.

- *Public Interest: *
*"Can we ask the board how it is coming with its research in the "global
public interest". In the annual mtg last where we asked the board about its
understanding of the global public interest, how it determines, on what
basis, etc.  At that time, the board said it was just getting started on
compiling some research that it would share and had hired Nora.  So it
would be great if we could have an update or further conversation on this
concept, how it is determined and applies, etc."*

there was several comments with that regard indicating that a research is
ongoing and mostly done within ICANN, not looking outside . a consultation
process is planned and starting in Q4 to get community input and continue
till June 2016.

-* Developing countries:*
starting with the Nielsen report (
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-09-25-en)
"Nielsen's report confirms that Latin America, Asia and Africa will likely
be the great drivers of new gTLD acceptance and use, while most registries
are still based in developed regions. There is a net transference of
resources taking place from the developing to the developed world in the
DNS industry. The problems that developing regions face have been
extensively explained.  What is the perception of the board? In the opinion
of board members, which concrete measures could be put in place? Why not
even suggestions from the JAS report have been implemented yet? Would the
board commit to a clear plan to address the current imbalances before a new
round of applications is launched?"

there was also comment that we can also ask the Global Domain Division
(GDD) during a GNSO session . Others mentioned: knowledge imbalance,
capacity building and remediation mechanisms of imbalance in next rounds

about this issue, I would remind people that we got lately 3 reports in
relation to that, it will be useful to go through them :
- regarding next rounds
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31-en
- review on previous new gTLD round:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-draft-review-2015-09-23-en
- assessment of new gTLD program with regard to competition:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/competitive-effects-assessment-2015-09-28-en

- *Human Rights*

"With the CCWP on HR we'll be publishing a new report on ICANN and

human rights (comments still very welcome until Wednesday 30 23:59

here: http://is.gd/gItc5W ). So perhaps we can ask ICANN about how

they envisage living up to article 4 of the articles of incorporation

and whether there are concrete plans to do or develop:

1. A human rights policy

2. A human rights impact assessment

3. A full corporate social responsibility strategy

in order to live up to the existing commitments. And whether they are

thinking of using the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human

Rights for this. And of course: what is the timeline for this."


I would like to add comment about developing countries and new gTLD program
issue, there was a lot of work done by NCSG on that matter within GNSO and
we succeeded in 2010 to get a joint working on new gTLD applicant support,
with the active participation of several NCSG members.
 A report  was delivered with several recommendations , some of them were
 approved in 2011 by the board :

- timeline for the working group is here
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/inactive/2011/jas

-  the report there
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/jas-final-report-2011-10-13-en

- the  implementation is here
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/candidate-support)

the result of the implementation was satisfactory due partly that the
program was implemented quite late when the new gTLD program itself was
starting and there was no significant outreach to get more applicants from
developing regions.

The same issue concerns having more registrars from developing countries
and there was last year  a consultation launched by ICANN staff
https://community.icann.org/display/prjctgdduro/Project+Roadmap%3A+Supporting+the+Domain+Name+Industry+in+Underserved+Regions
.

I would conclude about this  that we should leverage those existing
initiatives to go further and be effective.


going back to the topics discussion, it still going on and we should tune
and refine the topics and their descriptions. other suggestions are welcome
too.

Best Regards,

Rafik Dammak

NCSG Chair