Dear all, following the support on the list, I have put together the
following short and sweet text and have called for consensus on it. Any
suggestions?
Comments from the Non-commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) on the public
comment period related to the "Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars"
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the Registration
Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and
Registrars.
NCSG would like to give support to the points that have been raised by the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) in their contribution to this
consultation, which can be found at:
https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html
Particularly, the NCSG would like to stress the importance of specifying
the RDAP Profile in a way that leaves the broadest range of options to the
PDP on next-generation gTLD registration directory services from a policy
perspective.
Best wishes,
Marília
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Shears <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Good thought Desiree. Others?
>
>
> On Friday, 18 March 2016, Desiree Miloshevic <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.
>> While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I
>> do find that
>> google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g. not to offer public
>> access to the data.
>>
>> >>>
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf
>>
>> The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and
>> let registries/registrars
>> deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the
>> rest.
>>
>> So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing
>> (differentiated) access to the data immediately?
>> Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...
>>
>> Desiree
>> --
>>
>> On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I think it’s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Amr
>> >
>> >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is
>> today, 23:59 UTC.
>> >> Best wishes
>> >> M
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
>> >>
>> >> --Wendy
>> >>
>> >> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> >>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>> >>>
>> >>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>> >>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It
>> would
>> >>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee,
>> could
>> >>> share their views on the next hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> Marília
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <
>> [log in to unmask]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> All,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>> >>>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>> >>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts
>> that
>> >>>>> matter to us.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Shane
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> >>> [log in to unmask]
>> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marília Maciel
>> >> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito
>> Rio
>> >> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
>> School
>> >> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>> >> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> >> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
--
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
|
