NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:20:22 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1054 bytes) , text/html (2182 bytes)

http://gac.icann.org/system/files/GAC_on_MoPo_August_4_2010_0.pdf

GAC has spoken.  GAC sent a letter to ICANN Board this week:

"The GAC firmly believes that the absence of any controversial  
strings in the current universe of top-level domains (TLDs) to date  
contributes directly to the security and stability of the domain name  
and addressing system (DNS) and the universal resolvability of the  
system...."

So the governments claim there can be NO controversial tlds.  How  
enlightening!    And of course the old "security and stability"  
argument is trotted out to try to justify such an outrageous demand  
and curtailment of freedom.

Obviously this is not an issue of "security" of the Internet, but of  
trying to prevent people from being exposed to viewpoints that some  
govts don't like.

Let's see if the Board turns a few cartwheels to please govts on this  
one.

Robin


IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]





ATOM RSS1 RSS2