NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:44:15 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
  I was reading the gTLD Applicant Guidebook,
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/rfp-clean-19sep11-en.pdf,
for new gTLDs.  Part of the process is a technical review of the
applicant's capability to operate a Shared Registry System (SRS) and
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) system for communicating with
registrars.

  To my mind, the SRS and EPP are necessary for non-company related gTLDs.
If I were to operate .MyOwnCoolTLD, I would of course want all the
registrars to be able to register in it. I should have a registry
running SRS and using EPP.

  But how about for a private company? I'd imagine that Pepsi, the
beverage company selling carbonated sweetened water, would apply for
.pepsi and use it internally. If they are required to have a SRS and EPP
systems, is ICANN saying that the general public has the right to
register under those "company" domains, say horacio.pepsi, through the
existing registrars like godaddy?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2