Sure, +1.

Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal
process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of support"?

Dan


On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> 1+ for Avri.
>
> -J
>
>
>
> -J
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>
>> --c.a.
>>
>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> > Let me second that motion!
>> > In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need for
>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring to
>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well.
>> >
>> > The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's
>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is
>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our
>> own for Board seat 14.
>> >
>> > --MM
>