NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:31:30 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1226 bytes) , text/html (1811 bytes)
congrats Avri and thanks for the commitment  to keep us informed.
regarding the selection and the composition of ATRT, I am think in more
general view about the selection process of experts like that one for whois
expert etc. it should be more accountable and transparent, I guess another
issue for us to work on and push for change within ICANN.

Rafik


2013/2/17 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>

> On 15 Feb 2013, at 23:33, David Cake wrote:
>
> > Very pleased to see that NCSGs endorsed candidate, Avri Doria, in on the
> team. Congratulations Avri,
> > very pleased to have your depth of wisdom about process and your strong
> voice for transparency and accountability on the team.
>
> Thanks.  And I hope the NCSG accepts my thanks for having endorsed my
> candidacy for the slot.
>
> >  Interesting that after all the debate about GNSO endorsement, only 2 of
> the 4 GNSO endorsed candidates got picked.
>
> Indeed, one change from ATRT1 is that it seems they went for a smaller
> group.  Probably means they will want more work out of each of the people
> they chose.
>
> I will do my best to honor the NCSG's endorsement and the selectors'
> choice.  And will do my best to keep the NCSG informed and included in the
> process as we go through it.
>
> avri
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2