Dear Carlos,
I agree that we should raise this issue in the GNSO meeting with GDD.
However, I also see value in making a question about this topic to the
board. By doing that we are sending a clear message that this issue is
considered a high priority in our SG and we are giving it much more
visibility. A question to GDD does not have the same political importance.
Moreover, GDD is staff, is technical, and I believe this issue has a strong
political component that makes it a good candidate to be a "board
question". Finally, I already asked these questions to Atallah when he was
here for the launch of .Rio a couple of weeks ago and the answers were
evasive. I think it is time to take a shot with the board if others believe
this is an important issue.
Best!
Marília
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Dear marilia
>
> Very timely and interesting question
> But I would rather put it directly to Mr. Attala in the session with the
> GDD President. He has to give a clear answer on this question. The Board
> may remain at a very general level.
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> _____________________
>
> email: [log in to unmask]
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7173 (cel)
> +506 4000 2000 (home)
> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
> _____________________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi, I would like to support the topics suggested by Niels and Remmy, but I
> would take Remmy's point in a slightly different direction.
>
> Nielsen's report confirms that Latin America, Asia and Africa will likely
> be the great drivers of new gTLD acceptance and use, while most registries
> are still based in developed regions. There is a net transference of
> resources taking place from the developing to the developed world in the
> DNS industry. The problems that developing regions face have been
> extensively explained. What is the perception of the board? In the opinion
> of board members, which concrete measures could be put in place? Why not
> even suggestions from the JAS report have been implemented yet? Would the
> board commit to a clear plan to address the current imbalances before a new
> round of applications is launched?
>
> My two cents.
>
> Best,
> Marília
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Remmy Nweke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rafik
>> Can we ask the board on what the future holds on the use of the consumer
>> survey conducted recently by Nielsen to improve trust of common Internet
>> users or consumers especially in developing economies where service
>> providers hide under poor infrastructure to rip off data users.
>> regards
>> Remmy Nweke
>>
>>
>> ____
>> REMMY NWEKE, Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
>> DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
>> (DigitalSENSE Business News
>> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
>> <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, NaijaAgroNet
>> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
>> Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
>> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>> Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>> <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>
>> NDSF 2016
>> <https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153112418861429&set=a.119216361428.104226.716351428&type=1>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>> attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is
>> intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not
>> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this
>> document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other
>> person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes Nora briefed the GNSO, and I asked about getting access to her
>>> research. She said she would post a wiki, but they have not done any
>>> research outside ICANN yet, apparently. Makes one wonder how we actually
>>> determine "the public interest".
>>> Stephanie
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015-09-28 12:30, Robin Gross wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we ask the board how it is coming with its research in the "global
>>> public interest". I believe it was the annual mtg last where we asked the
>>> board about its understanding of the global public interest, how it
>>> determines, on what basis, etc. At that time, the board said it was just
>>> getting started on compiling some research that it would share and had
>>> hired Nora. So it would be great if we could have an update or further
>>> conversation on this concept, how it is determined and applies, etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Robin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> less than 3 weeks before Dublin meeting,need your input here :)
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2015-09-21 7:04 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak < <[log in to unmask]>
>>> [log in to unmask]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone.
>>>>
>>>> As described below, we should agree on 3 topics we would like to
>>>> discuss with the board at the session in dublin meeting.
>>>> Please propose a topic and give some description.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Ps please fill out this doodle poll about your attendance of dublin
>>>> meeting <http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy>
>>>> http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Rafik Dammak" < <[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Date: Sep 14, 2015 9:00 PM
>>>> Subject: [ICANN meeting] kick-off the preparation for ICANN meeting 53
>>>> in Dublin
>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Cc:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> we are just few weeks away from the next ICANN meeting in Dublin and we
>>>> have to be ready for that.
>>>>
>>>> First thing is to start the discussion about the topics we want to
>>>> discuss with the board during our joint meeting (f*or Dublin, it will
>>>> scheduled in Wednesday morning instead of Tuesday* as usual)
>>>>
>>>> Please share some topics for discussion and give some description to
>>>> explain the rationale. we will try to shorten the list up to 3 topics and
>>>> continue the discussion about those topics and how to present them in order
>>>> to get interaction.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, please fill the doodle poll (here
>>>> http://doodle.com/5umpi4cf2r2ue2dy)if you are going to attend the
>>>> ICANN meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Marília Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>
>
>
--
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
|
