Agree, this is concerning. 

However, note that it says "IF" ICANN creates an accreditation service. Have registrars agreed in principle that it should?



> -----Original Message-----

> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf

> Of Wendy Seltzer

> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 11:28 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] FW: ICANN and Registrar Negotiation Team Post

> Summary of RAA Negotiations

> 

> I'm very concerned by item 1 (below):

> 

> We should work to see the language and to ensure that it would not

> exclude the registration of names on another's behalf by an agent

> committed to protecting privacy, such as an attorney.

> 

> LEA REQUEST 1: (a) If ICANN creates a Privacy/Proxy Accreditation

> Service, Registrars will accept proxy/privacy registrations only

> from accredited providers; (b) “Registrants using privacy/proxy

> registration services will have authentic Whois information

> immediately published by Registrar when registrant is found to be

> violating terms of service”

>