Hold on Wednesday as in tomorrow?



From: NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Matthew Shears

Reply-To: Matthew Shears

Date: Tuesday 23 June 2015 23:08

To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>"

Subject: Re: [Important] Breakfast session between NCSG and CSG



And, there better be coffee and donuts at that hour





On Tuesday, 23 June 2015, Matthew Shears <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Ok so I understand the planning constraints but truly this is getting absurd - if this is an indication of the future and shortened meetings so we will go later and start earlier we seriously need to get a grip



On Tuesday, 23 June 2015, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,



yes. the issue with ICANN meeting since last BA meeting in 2013 is the increase of sessions that led to have to ones starting early  before 8:00am and ending late around 8:00pm.

 We tried to find out available timeslot and breakfast time was almost the only choice we had. in Dublin meeting, we are going try to secure timeslot more earlier. things may get more complicated when ICANN will start with the new meetings format in 2016.



Best,



Rafik



2015-06-24 8:42 GMT+09:00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>:

Really at 7:15 am ??????



Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

ISOC Costa Rica Chapter

skype carlos.raulg

+506 8837 7176<tel:%2B506%208837%207176>  (New  Phone number!!!!)

________

Apartado 1571-1000

COSTA RICA



On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi everyone,



for those in Buenos Aires ICANN meeting, this is a reminder that we have a meeting with Commercial Stakeholder Group tomorrow Wednesday , to get a chance to know about their members and discuss with them



so please come to Catalinas Room at 7:15 am. we are starting early so those interested can go to GAC-Board meeting later.



please be in time and we are also  going to try to have tables with ncsg and csg members in order to know each other. so we should avoid having "NCSG tables"



One topic for discussion would be the GNSO review.



see you tomorrow.



Best Regards,



Rafik