Hi Brenden,

Thanks for sharing this, we have as NCSG to respond to the comment
regarding the draft proposal from ICANN too (the scoping document is part
of it).

Best Regards,

Rafik


2014-04-18 1:20 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>:

> In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with
> transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how ICANN
> has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a narrow Scoping
> Document:
>
>
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/
>
> The IGP thinks this is wrong.  Yesterday, the European Commission agreed
> with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in the scope of
> the discussion."
>
> Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined version of
> the document, which revises the scope according to the NTIA's announcement:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit
>
> We invite your comments or suggestions.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>