NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:20:29 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (877 bytes) , text/html (1491 bytes)
In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with
transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how ICANN
has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a narrow Scoping
Document:

http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/

The IGP thinks this is wrong.  Yesterday, the European Commission agreed
with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in the scope of
the discussion."

Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined version of
the document, which revises the scope according to the NTIA's announcement:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit

We invite your comments or suggestions.

Thanks!



---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org


ATOM RSS1 RSS2