LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Mime-Version:	1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:	Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:27:02 -0500
Reply-To:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level
From:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	quoted-printable
Sender:	NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (10 lines)

Hi,

Both IOC and IFRC have been given an exception for this round of new gTLDs by direct BoardStaff fiat, though it is against every previous policy recommendation and on the advice, for some meaning of 'advice', of just one AC.  I just do not understand why they would be granted anything further than that.

avri

On 3 Feb 2012, at 07:30, Timothe Litt wrote:

> While I agree with the sentiment that the IRC has a marginally better claim to "protection" than the IOC, I oppose special protection for both.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU