NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:45:10 +0100
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [liaison6c] FW: January NomCom Report Card
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Now if only we could from time to time get some NCAs that aren't totally aligned with industry, that'd help in the voting….

BD

On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On 24 Jan 2013, at 16:10, Robin Gross wrote:
> 
>> <NomCom Report Card Jan 2013.pdf>
> 
> 
> it is a good start.
> 
> Thanks to the Nomcom for these first steps in transparency.
> 
> avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2