NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:23:28 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (730 bytes) , text/html (8 kB)
Hi Avri,

Thanks for doing this.

Would it be possible to insert the word "transparency" in the document 
somewhere? I'd suggest here: 

inherent conflict of interest behind staff developing its own
accountability and transparency mechanisms, so it was surprising to see that 
input had


but anywhere is fine. The important thing is to keep the concept alive, and 
the concept of accountability broad. 

I'll note that the Thune-Rubio letter that so concerned Mr. Chehade: 

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/thune-rubio-to-crocker-31jul14-en.pdf

calls for a FOIA type mechanism at ICANN. In debating accountability 
structures I don't want to lose sight of the fact that accountability 
without transparency is impossible.

Thanks,

Ed



ATOM RSS1 RSS2