NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:38:29 +0100
Reply-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Robin,

There were dire expressions of concern by the IPC during the GNSO-GAC  
meeting (and some interesting parallels with governments' views on  
geographic---or conceivably related to geographic---names) but  
otherwise I don't recall any such discussion.  I presume this is a  
board response to some back channel discussions.  Obviously it'd make  
sense to ask for a seat at the table and transparency/reporting in its  
operations.

Bill

On Mar 9, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> Has there been any discussion of this IRT on the GNSO Counsel?   How  
> do we make sure that balanced perspectives make their way onto the  
> new "ITR Team"?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2