NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:18:13 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (798 bytes) , text/html (1183 bytes)
Occam's razor: If it was a political issue, ICANN would have other tools to
implement it (such as, e.g., to define a particular set of rules and
requirements an applicant should have to fullfill).


2010/3/21 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

> Norbert hit the nail on the head here.
> I reiterate my belief that the application fee and obligations imposed by
> ICANN are more about limiting entry for various political reasons than
> anything else.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I do not think it is mainly a question of "dis-advantaged entities" - it
> > is a question of (1) how the "basic set of obligations" is defined, and
> > (2) in which economic context. If it is expensive to fulfill the
> > obligations in Japan and the USA, that does not prove they cannot be
> > fulfilled in another context.
> >
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2