Carlos,
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 Jun 2016, at 12:42, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]> But maybe we are talking about a very easy "clerical role" and everything is covered by the new ACCT framework. Maybe you can enlighten me here.
Well, in theory...
We probably could and should have put provisions in the various transition WG's to prevent potential conflicts like this but we didn't. Post harm there may be mechanisms to get redress via broad readings of some of the mission provisions and appeals to applicable law through an IRP but it would be messy and indirect.
Nice catch Avri. Any suggested routes, anyone, to fixing this quite obvious potential conflict of interest. At best the optics are bad: at worse there are possible conflicts that could engender distrust of various processes.
Ed
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
> skype carlos.raulg
> +506 8837 7176
> ________
> Apartado 1571-1000
> COSTA RICA
>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:32 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's plan/rationale for
>> secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity.
>>
>> The position I have taken personally is:
>>
>> - I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the current
>> employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA
>> employees that wish to the PTI.
>>
>> - with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be
>> the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms
>> of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I think that
>> from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee
>> reporting solely to the PTI board.
>>
>> - i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not
>> ICANN. there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those
>> seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are treated
>> well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem.
>>
>> The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us
>> thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part of the
>> separability formula.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000
>> From: Yuko Green <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear members of the IOTF,
>>
>>
>>
>> Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we
>> have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward
>> to hearing any feedback you may have.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Yuko Green*
>>
>> Strategic Programs Manager
>>
>> Global Domains Division
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>>
>>
>> Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693
>>
>> Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
>>
>> E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
|
