Adam Peake said:

>>Suggest we begin by thinking of comments we can send before Sept 13
>>on structure and methodology of the working group, and general
>>composition.  I don't think we must limit ourselves to what we think
>>politically possible (e.g. Veni's probably correct reading of the
>>way things will work out), but instead suggest what we believe is
>>right, and say why.

   I suggest that we look at how the IFWP developed into ICANN and
see how the WGIG process can be prevented from birthing another ICANN.

--
Horacio T. Cadiz
********************************************
* Linux. No Windows. No Gates. It is Open. *
* No Bill. It is Free.                     *
********************************************