+1


On 16-Aug-16 17:54, Mamadou LO wrote:
> My support to this. Resumes can really help know more on candidates.
> Good idea.
> Mamadou
>
>
> Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.
>
>
> -------- Message d'origine --------
> De : Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
> Date : 16/08/2016 21:41 (GMT+00:00)
> À : [log in to unmask]
> Objet : Re: Perrin Candidate Statement
>
> Agreed.  It is important for members to become more acquainted with
> our representatives and resumes are extremely helpful for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>> On Aug 16, 2016, at 2:33 PM, matthew shears <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to support this suggestion and ask that all candidates
>> provide their resumes.
>>
>> Thanks James.
>>
>>
>> On 16/08/2016 22:16, James Gannon wrote:
>>> Hey Stephanie,
>>>
>>> Actually that’s a really good idea on resumes, would like to see the
>>> candidates share these as its a critical part of the skill set that
>>> they are brining to the table.
>>> Particularly useful for our members who may not know the candidates
>>> personally.
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>> From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Stephanie
>>> Perrin <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> Reply-To: Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> Date: Tuesday 16 August 2016 at 21:57
>>> To: "[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>"
>>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> Subject: Perrin Candidate Statement
>>>
>>> Attached is my candidate statement in Word, also copied below.  I
>>> fear not much has changed since my statement in 2014....in
>>> particular I would have hoped that my dissertation would have been
>>> finished!! Soon though....:-)
>>>
>>> My resume is available to anyone who is interested.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Stephanie Perrin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Name:*  Stephanie Perrin
>>> *Region of residence:*  Canada, North America
>>> *Gender:*  female
>>> *Employment: * PhD candidate, retired federal public servant
>>> *Conflicts of Interest: * none that I am aware of
>>> *Reasons for willingness to take on the position:* 
>>> My candidate statement has not really changed from what I submitted
>>> in 2014.  I still believe that ICANN is a wonderful experiment in
>>> multistakeholder management of a key resource.  I still want it to
>>> work, but after two years of hard work on Council and various PDPs I
>>> understand the threats and challenges better.  I believe that my
>>> experience and knowledge can be useful at ICANN. I am a hard worker
>>> and a passionate advocate, and I would like to try to make a
>>> difference here.  There is a great team at NCSG, many different
>>> characters with all kinds of talents and skills, and I would be
>>> proud to represent them and the non-commercial users we all
>>> represent at the GNSO.  I have a lot of international experience, I
>>> understand key stakeholders like the GAC, and I would love the
>>> challenge of trying to help find solutions for some of the policy
>>> and procedural issues with which the GNSO struggles.
>>>  
>>> *Qualifications for the position:*
>>> I have spent 30 years in the Canadian federal government, most of it
>>> in the Department of Communications and the Department of Industry,
>>> in the areas of telecom policy, and international trade in
>>> telecommunciations, media and broadcasting, and intellectual
>>> property.   I worked in Canada-US  trade and technology impact
>>> assessment, during the 90s when the Internet was developed, and have
>>> broad experience working with governments on e-commence.  I
>>> represented Canada at the OECD working group on security and privacy
>>> for ten years, and was a vice-chair of the group which developed
>>> cryptography policy guidelines.  During the 90s, I also worked for
>>> ten years on Canada's privacy standard (CAN/CSA-Q830-96) and was
>>> Director of Privacy Policy responsible for turning that standard
>>> into Canada's private sector privacy law.  After the law passed, I
>>> took leave and went to work as Canada's first Chief Privacy Officer,
>>> for Zero Knowledge Systems, a privacy enhancing technology company
>>> that developed anonymous browsing and email software. I have also
>>> worked, back in government, for six years in risk management,
>>> integrity, and values and ethics.  I also was Director of Research
>>> and Policy at the federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner, and
>>> worked to steer the office to examine Internet issues, including the
>>> ICANN WHOIS issues of the day (2005-7).  I have done a lot of public
>>> speaking, and believe I can intervene effectively to represent you. 
>>> I am fluent in English and French. 
>>>
>>> This experience is very relevant to the policy issues I see at
>>> ICANN, for the following reasons: 
>>> ·ICANN is at an inflection point in terms of its maturity.  It needs
>>> to mature and develop better risk management, better accountability
>>> and values and ethics, and better compliance with human rights law. 
>>> I think my practical government experience in these areas could be
>>> useful.
>>> ·There are serious privacy issues at ICANN, and a lack of
>>> expertise.  This is my principal area of expertise, and I have a
>>> keen desire to contribute and to make things better.
>>> ·During 2013-2014 I worked on the Experts Working Group on directory
>>> services for new gTLDs, (WHOIS replacement) where I learned quite a
>>> lot about the issues behind this key debate.  I have now joined the
>>> GNSO/RDS PDP where it is critical to have someone who understands
>>> the EWG report, as it is clearly the template for future work.
>>> ·During the past two years I worked on the working group on
>>> accreditation of Privacy Proxy Services, and on the working group on
>>> policy and implementation as well as the working group looking at
>>> WHOIS conflicts with law..   I also worked on the GNSO Review team,
>>> and prepared detailed comments on the outside examiners report.   I
>>> have monitored all the CCWG work on the IANA transition, and I
>>> regularly review budget reports. 
>>> ·Again, my government policy and management experience, and the many
>>> years that I have volunteered on standards development groups and
>>> shadow groups have, I think, given me insight into these processes
>>> that has proven useful. 
>>> *Statement of availability for the time the position required:  *
>>> I am no longer working fulltime, and my studies are focused on
>>> issues related to ICANN.  I therefore have abundant time to devote
>>> to ICANN work, particularly the GNSO.  Over the past two years I
>>> have devoted approximately half my work week to ICANN.
>>>  
>>> *Additional information: *
>>> I am studying at the Information School of the University of
>>> Toronto.  I am writing my PhD dissertation  on why ICANN has refused
>>> to adopt privacy policy or law.  I have spent my career either
>>> applying law or developing solutions, including technology and law,
>>> so my return to school is largely to satisfy that hunger to
>>> understand things at a more theoretical level.  I continue to work
>>> to also fix that problem, and get some practical implementation of
>>> commonly accepted privacy policies at ICANN.  This is my focus in
>>> much of the PDP work I have done, because there is a lot happening
>>> on privacy issues, but it is certainly not my only area of
>>> interest.  It is important that we pace our work to avoid burnout,
>>> but I am also keenly interested in attracting new talent to work at
>>> ICANN, and in mentoring. 
>>>
>>> Thanks for your attention.
>>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>> -- 
>> --------------
>> Matthew Shears
>> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
>> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
>> + 44 771 2472987
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus