NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:28:06 +0000
Reply-To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I agree with Avri here. The nxt NCSG EC meeting we can take this up

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] (Re) Introduction
> 
> On 24 Oct 2012, at 02:34, William Drake wrote:
> 
> > While I conversely have stepped down after serving 4 years as NCUC liaison
> to ALAC, so we'll need to fill that slot after our election.
> 
> 
> While obviously both NCUC and NPOC can send their own liaisons to ALAC,
> assuming ALAC accepts them, I think it makes more sense for there to be a
> NCSG Liaison.  The NCUC liaison is a hangover from the days before the NCSG
> was created.  At this point, I think the more important liaison is one from
> NCSG.
> 
> avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2