NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Evan Leibovitch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Evan Leibovitch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:03:44 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (821 bytes) , text/html (1284 bytes)
FYI, they're not alone.

Yesterday The Economist magazine (the one in which ICANN is posting its CEO
recruitment ads) released a
podcast<http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/01/babbage-january-11th-2012?fsrc=nlw%7Cnewe%7C1-11-2012%7Cnew_on_the_economist>dealing
with ICANN (amongs other things, the Consumer Electronics Show in
Vegas got top billing and the ICANN comments start at 3:45).

The discussion of the issue includes the comment that the new gTLD program
"could be a disaster".

- Evan



On 12 January 2012 13:11, warigia bowman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> There was an ICANN story on NPR this morning. It made it sound like the
> extra domain names are a big mistake, and are going to add confusion to the
> Internet, and force people to do defensive spending to protect that IP in
> cyberspace.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rigia
>
>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2