+1

Nicolas

On 05/09/2013 6:50 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Thanks Avri. I'm happy with all three statements and the addition you suggested.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Amr
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
>>
>> What do people think about the following?
>>
>> I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
>>
>> Please comment.
>> Any objections?
>> Any edits?
>>
>> -----
>>
>>
>> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
>>
>> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
>> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
>>
>> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
>>
>> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
>>
>> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
>>
>> so please say something
>>
>> avri