The report of the .net subcommittee has been reviced (slightly) on the
basis of public comment. Now it up for another round of comments, and
for submissions by constituencies. So what do we think?

The report is not very long, esp. not if you skip the introductory
part (history) and the appendix, which gives the present .net
agreement.

Please, send any input (or agreement) to this list ASAP. Thank you.

Marc Schneiders
Council rep.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:52:58 +0200
From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <[log in to unmask]>
To: council <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [council] Call for Constituency submissions: dot net sub-committee
    Initial Report

[To: liaiason6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org]

Draft Criteria for .net

Call for Constituency submissions

These may be simple written expressions of support if a Constituency agrees
with the content of the Initial Report of
the GNSO dot net sub-committee

The Initial Report of the GNSO sub-committee may be viewed here.

http://www.icann.org/tlds/dotnet-reassignment/dotnet-committee-report-23jun0
4.htm

Please send your submissions to:
[log in to unmask]

Archives may be found at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/dotnet-criteria/

by July 9, 19:00 UTC

Thank you very much.

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat