-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
OK. I agree with Kathy that this kind of interpellation should be done
first privately, then brought to the list if needed.
fraternal regards
- --c.a.
On 9/22/15 04:39, Joy Liddicoat wrote:
> Well said Avri, I agree Thanks Ed for all your work and Milton for
> yours,
>
>
>
> Joy Liddicoat Sent from my phone
>
>
>
>> On 22/09/2015, at 08:15, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> The only thing I would add is that one of the prices we pay for
>> 'voting our consciences' in council and elsewhere is sometimes
>> being challenged to explain ourselves.
>>
>> Milton challenged, and Ed responded.
>>
>> Perhaps it was a bit more acrimonious than it might have been,
>> but that may be in NCSG's nature. And perhaps the explanation was
>> more detailed than some of us might have written, that may be in
>> Ed's nature and a trait we have often benefited from.
>>
>> The question was posed and the response given.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>> On 21-Sep-15 15:19, Kathy Kleiman wrote: Hi Milton and All,
>>>
>>> We all agree that Ed has been a “fantastic contributor to the
>>> Noncommercials.” He has devoted thousands of hours to policy
>>> discussions and documents, to Independent Review Process work,
>>> document requests, GNSO Council preparation and leadership and
>>> much more. As with a core of people in the NCSG, he has devoted
>>> enormous amounts of his professional and personal time and
>>> skills to advancing the interests and concerns of the
>>> noncommercial community. Ed has been very successful, and I,
>>> for one, am very glad that he has taken lion’s share of many
>>> important projects.
>>>
>>>
>>> What we appear to be arguing about here, and strangely on a
>>> public list, is whether the CCWG participation and attendance
>>> policy makes sense and should be a basis for determining
>>> funding for a CCWG in-person meeting. The answer, of course, is
>>> no, every community should have equal representation. But
>>> that’s not the policy that was adopted and that not the way
>>> that slots for a meeting taking place
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=uKSa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
